Sep 4, 2008 5:40 PM Posted by brittneygilbert Jeremy at Metroblogging San Francisco comments on the rash of crime that has been occuring in Glen Park:
Glen Park has been subject to a wave of robberies in the past six
months, mostly random street muggings. The reasons are obvious to
anybody who spends as much time there as I do: BART station, freeway
on-ramps, and residents who generally have iPods or laptops with them.
Residents, I might add, who are smart enough to hand the goods over
without a fight. No wonder predators are drawn to the neighborhood from
miles away. Nevius writes of them: “No one knows who they are or where
they are coming from.” Technically true, but residents have their
suspicions, and unlike Nevius I’ll tell you exactly what they suspect:
thanks to BART, the sociopaths living in Oakland and Richmond are right
next door. What with the downturn in our economy, it’s likely that this
is a problem that won’t go away.Glen Park has been subject to a wave of robberies in the past six
months, mostly random street muggings. The reasons are obvious to
anybody who spends as much time there as I do: BART station, freeway
on-ramps, and residents who generally have iPods or laptops with them.
Residents, I might add, who are smart enough to hand the goods over
without a fight. No wonder predators are drawn to the neighborhood from
miles away. Nevius writes of them: “No one knows who they are or where
they are coming from.” Technically true, but residents have their
suspicions, and unlike Nevius I’ll tell you exactly what they suspect:
thanks to BART, the sociopaths living in Oakland and Richmond are right
next door. What with the downturn in our economy, it’s likely that this
is a problem that won’t go away. [emphasis mine]
Jeremy offers up security suggestions that might crimp potential criminals' style. Go see what you think. Sep 4, 2008 5:30 PM Posted by brittneygilbert "Is it a bad sign for our country when it’s a comedy network that has the investigative reporting?" -Queeristan Sep 4, 2008 5:19 PM Posted by brittneygilbert "I don't like lying. I don't like holding secrets unless I can unwrap them soon and see the faces of those I love illuminated. Soon."A favorite local blog of mine is the eggbeater. It's more journal than link blog, and I love it because the pastry chef (who is widely known and highly sought after) shares genuine bits from her life that bring shape and perspective to her impressive resume. She talks in her latest post about having to hide where she works from readers, even friends a family. Her blog is an interesting peek into the life of a thoughtful chef, who also happens to be a great writer. Sep 4, 2008 4:51 PM Posted by brittneygilbert The blogger at A Sonoma Garden, due to her grandmother's move into an assisted living facility, has become the proud new owner of said grandmother's collection of recipes. Hand-written in a flowery longhand, the photos of the recipes are worth a look in and of themselves. But what's interesting is that what Grandma used to cook may not be in line with what you thought:
After reading Michael Pollen’s In Defense of Food,
I’ve been very curious about what my great grandmother cooked for her
family of four. Michael advised that when grocery shopping you should
think of your grandmother or great-grandmother. If she wouldn’t have
recognized the food item, don’t buy it. He argued that because our
ancestors kept processed foods out of there diet, they ate healthier. I
am here to tell you, after extensively reading through each recipe in
this collection, that Michael Pollen did not have my family in mind
when writing his book. I’m quite certain that my great-grandmother
wouldn’t have recognized his example of GoGurt. But I’m also quite
certain that once she had figured out what it was, she would have
grabbed a handful of them.
I was surprised to find in those tin boxes that more than half of
the cake recipes called for store bought cake mixes. The salads were
full of jello and canned fruit.
Read the rest. Locavores and and whole food health nuts are especially encouraged to head on over. Sep 4, 2008 4:16 PM Posted by brittneygilbert Sep 4, 2008 2:45 PM Posted by brittneygilbert "Last night Sarah Palin laid out how the McCain/Palin ticket intend to
run this country: With scorn and belligerence for anyone who tries to
bring their communities together to make things better. The Courage
Campaign has spent years trying to empower exactly the sort of
grassroots initiative that's vital to bringing about meaningful change.
If we're ever going to address the fundamental failings of our
government, we need a new presidential administration that doesn't try
to squash the little guy. And in a speech that neglected to
mention education, health care, comprehensive economic reforms, or
choice, we heard in Palin's silence exactly her trouble with community
organizing: An organized community is an empowered community." -- Lucas O'Connor, Calitics Sep 4, 2008 12:01 PM Posted by brittneygilbert Seems most of the country, even those in the liberal enclave that is the Bay Area, was tuned in to see a pitbull in lipstick address the nation she hopes to lead. Palin was shrill, obnoxious and she lied about Barack Obama's record too many times to count. The GOP base that made up the audience ate it up like a moose yet to be field-dressed. But those are just my opinions. Here's what local bloggers thought about Palin and her speech last night at the Republican Convention in St. Paul, Minnesota: State of Grace, on Palin's role as a mother: I am receiving an incredible amount of flack from my sister
feminists for my very strong opinion that Gov. Palin should not advance her
career on the back of her daughter. In fact, I believe with all of my
heart and mind that it is a feminist ideal for Gov Palin and any mother to
protect her daughter from a culture that is vicious to unwed, pregnant teenage
girls.
Nurturing our children is in the core of feminism. Just ask our feminist kids
and feminist husband (and my feminist ex-husband).
The Gay Species:
I don't want to rain on the parade of life that Sarah pumped into all
those white warriors in Minnesota, but has anyone noticed the big VOID?
[...] The "Economy." Not ONE WORD about the "Economy" has been uttered in St.
Paul. If you want more of the same Bush-Cheney CRAP, with extremist
judges, lawless executives, violations of the Constitution, and kicking
butt wherever unemployed Americans can find an asshole, so that
neoconservatives can use power to kill Gentiles, then Sarah "McCain"
Palin hit the ball out of the park. But, if you want a Polish Frank
with mustard and kraut, a beer, pretzel, and prayer in your stadiums
prior to your revival hour -- GO ASK CHINA for a handout (or a loan). Frank D. Russo at California Progress Report:
The attack on Barack Obama’s work as a community
organizer—helping displaced workers deal with shut down steel
factories—basically living the social gospel, walking the walk—when he could
have had any six figure job in a cushy law firm with having pulled himself up
by his bootstraps Horatio Alger like and not only graduated from Harvard Law
School but as Editor of the Harvard Law School—is nothing short of despicable. Robert Solis of SF Bay Area:
Aside from wishing to become the First Lady Moose Hunter of America, Sarah Palin clearly and heartily
presented an image that transcends her suddenly acquired Hollywood
star status.
Without reservation, she endorsed every single element of
the Bush-McCain ideology. […]
Yes, now we know. Last night a star was born. The third
point of the Bush-McCain-Palin Axis. PretePress:
Palin needed to give uncommitted voters and some of those Clinton voters substantive
reasons to choose McCain, and in this she failed utterly.
I don’t think Palin’s smug and smarmy manner did her or her
running mate any favors, either. […] [McCain] seems to respect people who
disagree with him. […] Palin, on the other hand, came off as if she were a
popular kid running against a loathsome nerd for junior-high class president. Anderson@Large:
While I disagree with Palin
on abortion, guns, sex education – pick an issue – the media’s coverage has
been blatantly sexist.
[…]Did anyone question whether the late Robert F. Kennedy
should have run for president? Kennedy had 10 children and a pregnant wife.
Fast forward 40 years, did the media call for John Edwards to drop out when his
wife was diagnosed with an incurable form of cancer?
[More as I find them.] Sep 4, 2008 11:27 AM Posted by brittneygilbert Sep 4, 2008 10:42 AM Posted by brittneygilbert I am working on writing a 1:30 minute spot on blogger reactions to the Palin speech last night that will air in the evening newscasts. Due to the time it will take to create this piece, posting will be slow today.  Check out our mini-aggregator on the right hand side of this blog to check out new posts from some local bloggers. Sep 4, 2008 10:16 AM Posted by brittneygilbert  These three people do not know each other. They all entered the train at different times. The man on the right was talking on his cell phone when all of the sudden he stuck his funk-nasty flip-flop adorned foot up onto the arm rest of the seat in front of him. I kinda couldn't believe it. Then he started picking at his dirty feet! He was pulling dead skin off the heel of his foot, chatting on his phone, all the while completely invading the space of the lady, who was much more accomodating than I would have been. There is no question as to whether this is acceptable BART behavior or not. This is straight up disgusting. I've seen flossing, hair plucking and nose picking, but this one takes the cake. RELATED BLOGS: Muni Manners Muni Diaries BART Rage BART Musings Sep 3, 2008 5:45 PM Posted by brittneygilbert Not entirely sure why I find this video of random San Franciscans reciting the digits of pi so charming, but I do. It takes a lot of guts to ask strangers on the street to be subjects of your video, and Nick asked quite a few. Wonder how many rejected him. [via Laughing Squid] Sep 3, 2008 4:55 PM Posted by brittneygilbert If you can't wait for Sarah Palin's speech tonight, or if you've got to take the kids to hockey practice, you can read some of it in advance at Josh Richman's blog. Here's just a bit:
“Our opponents say, again and again, that drilling will not solve all
of America’s energy problems - as if we all didn’t know that already.
But the fact that drilling won’t solve every problem is no excuse to do
nothing at all. Starting in January, in a McCain-Palin administration,
we’re going to lay more pipelines…build more nuclear plants…create jobs
with clean coal…and move forward on solar, wind, geothermal, and other
alternative sources. We need American energy resources, brought to you
by American ingenuity, and produced by American workers.”
Get the rest. Sep 3, 2008 4:22 PM Posted by brittneygilbert  [Taken at Bernal Heights Park] Where is your very favorite place to go in San Francisco to see a stunning cityscape?  [Taken at Bernal Heights Park] Sep 3, 2008 4:01 PM Posted by brittneygilbert Lance Knobel anticipates that Sarah Palin will do a bang-up job tonight behind the podium, and that her speech will be well-recieved by the mainstream media. But, he says:
What none of it will do is erase the completely impulsive decision
making behind the choice. It won’t provide any response to Palin’s
abhorrent (to my mind) views on teaching creationism, denying the human
role in global warming, and opposing abortion in any circumstances.
Despite the bloviating about her having more “executive experience”
than any of the senators in the race, she’ll still have the thinnest
set of credentials of any candidate in the last hundred years. It’s a
joke.
Got any predictions of your own on how Palin will fair tonight in St. Paul? Sep 3, 2008 3:34 PM Posted by brittneygilbert It's been real estate-y around here of late, so it's only fitting that I just discovered a new Bay Area blog devoted to housing. This one is called Knife Catchers, and it is focused on Alameda island living. Check it out, it's good stuff. [via Alamedans] Sep 3, 2008 3:11 PM Posted by brittneygilbert Sep 3, 2008 2:40 PM Posted by brittneygilbert Oh, this is gold. Pure, unadulterated gold. Thanks to the good blogger at Here and There, we are now privvy to what conservatives *really* think about Palin as McCain's VP pick: Politico has a transcript, for those of you who don't have 90 seconds to spare:
Republican consultant Mike Murphy and Wall Street Journal columnist
Peggy Noonan were caught on a live mic ridiculing the choice of Sarah
Palin.
"It’s over," said Noonan, and then responded to a question of
whether Palin is the most qualified Republican woman McCain could have
chosen.
"The most qualified? No. I think they went for this — excuse me —
political bullshit about narratives," she said. "Every time Republicans
do that — because that’s not where they live and it’s not what they’re
good at and they blow it." Said it before, I'll say it again: Best Election Ever. Notice how Obama is nowhere near this story? Pretty smart. The media's doing all the work for him. And now the conservative talking heads are too. UPDATE: Noonan responds!:Well, I just got mugged by the nature of modern media, and I wish it
weren't my fault, but it is. Readers deserve an explanation, so I'm
putting a new top on today's column and, with the forbearance of the
Journal, here it is. ... When the segment was over and MSNBC was in commercial, Todd, Murphy and
I continued our conversation, talking about the Palin choice overall.
We were speaking informally, with some passion -- and into live mics.
An audio tape of that conversation was sent, how or by whom I don't
know, onto the internet. And within three hours I was receiving it from
friends far and wide, asking me why I thought the McCain campaign is
"over", as it says in the transcript of the conversation. Here I must
plead some confusion. In our off-air conversation, I got on the subject
of the leaders of the Republican party assuming, now, that whatever the
base of the Republican party thinks is what America thinks. I made the
case that this is no longer true, that party leaders seem to me stuck
in the assumptions of 1988 and 1994, the assumptions that reigned when
they were young and coming up. "The first lesson they learned is the
one they remember," I said to Todd -- and I'm pretty certain that is a
direct quote. But, I argued, that's over, those assumptions are
yesterday, the party can no longer assume that its base is utterly in
line with the thinking of the American people. And when I said, "It's
over!" -- and I said it more than once -- that is what I was referring
to. I am pretty certain that is exactly what Todd and Murphy understood
I was referring to. In the truncated version of the conversation, on
the Web, it appears I am saying the McCain campaign is over. I did not
say it, and do not think it. In fact, at an on-the-record press
symposium on the campaign on Monday, when all of those on the panel
were pressed to predict who would win, I said that I didn't know, but
that we just might find "This IS a country for old men." That is,
McCain may well win. I do not think the campaign is over, I do not
think this is settled, and did not suggest, back to the Todd-Murphy
conversation, that "It's over."Her response in full. Sep 3, 2008 2:14 PM Posted by brittneygilbert The East Bay Conservative wants to know why, if so many in the East Bay so regularly hold protests, they don't take to the streets in protest of senseless crime going on right under their noses: [O]ur local killing fields aren’t generating a meaningful response
from our local protesters. They’re too busy fooling around with the
trees over at the Berkeley stadium to think about hundreds murdered
right under our noses.
Why no marches and protests?
Do people think there’s nothing our government can do about this
problem? If so, that’s complete nonsense. Public safety is one of the
few functions which governments have historically performed pretty well.
The City of Oakland has an enormous budget. It possesses police
powers and lawmaking authority which permit all manner of actions to
stop violence. Just take a look at what the mayor of New Orleans told
his citizens prior to Hurricane Gustav: Loot and you go directly to the
state penitentiary.
Oakland’s epidemic of violence is one of the few situations where
activists can make a legitimate difference in a community. Let’s face
it — activism didn’t stop the invasion of Iraq. It hasn’t halted global
warming. But in this time and place the grass roots has an opportunity
to do something.
Want action out of Mayor Oswald Bates and his crook squad? Take to
the streets! Hold a general strike! Jam the Bart stations so nothing
can move until we get action!
There is much more at the minority conservative's haunt. Head over, read the rest and see if you agree. Sep 3, 2008 1:03 PM Posted by brittneygilbert When I first began blogging, back in 1999, I used software to self-publish. It was that simple. I didn't think about creating my personal brand, Webbie awards, post quotas or headline keywords. What once was a simple tool to for people to express themselves somehow became an industry, a trend, something to monetize. Initially I found those analyzing what "new media" meant in such a meta manner self-indulgent, not to mention wasting their time. Now the entrenched media elite, pretentious PR agencies and corporations of every stripe are scrambling to harness the power of web publishing, be it large, group blogs or 140 character "tweets". Blog "consulting" is now an actual thing, so those who wondered aloud about where blogging, the movement, would take us were right to track it all along. But where has it taken us, exactly? Were the predictions correct? Blogging has now reached, without a doubt, a critical mass, at least in the US. Everyone and their Mom has a blog these days, be it on MySpace or Facebook or just a "microblog," consisting of 140 character-long entries at a time. Saturation (pictures on Flickr! jokes on Twitter! vids on YouTube!) is the name of the Make a Name for Yourself new media game. Faster, shorter, more, more, more. So long as you are pumping out distractions by the hour, on the hour, then someone, somewhere, bored by the bland beige cube walls that contain them, will care. This is what Twitter superstar, new media consultant and likely member of the [groan] 250, Merlin Mann is writing about at his excellent Kung Fu Grippe:
Gumming the edges of popular culture and occasionally rolling the
results into a wicked spitball has a noble tradition that includes the
best work of of Voltaire, Dorothy Parker, Oscar Wilde, and a handful of
people I count as good friends and brilliant editors. There’s nothing
wrong with f*cking sh*t up every single day. But you have to bring some
art to it. Not just typing.
What worries me are the consequences of a diet comprised mostly of
fake-connectedness, makebelieve insight, and unedited first drafts of everything.
I think it’s making us small. I know that whenever I become aware of
it, I realize how small it can make me. So, I’ve come to despise it.
With this diet metaphor in mind, I want to, if you like, start eating better. But, I also want to start growing a tastier tomato — regardless of how easy it is to pick, package, ship, or vend. The tomato is the story, my friend.
This doesn’t mean I’ll be liveblogging a lot of ham-fisted attempts
to turn “everything” off. But it does mean making mindful decisions
about the quality of any input that I check repeatedly — as well as any
“stuff” I produce. Everything. From news sources to entertainment
programming, and from ephemeral web content down to each email message
I decide to respond to. The shit has to go, inclusive. If Google is making us dumb, then providing content for Google just might be doing the same. Read more of Mann's thought-provoking post, and then think hard before you publish your next piece. Then it just might matter. [This post a first-draft due to time constraints. After reading Mann's essay I feel bad about that.] Sep 3, 2008 12:22 PM Posted by brittneygilbert This year, Karen Caldwell’s dress is all about the 3 C’s: Concept,
Color and Cut. Inspired by the magnificent dahlia flower and a pair of
vintage turquoise earrings that Ms. Caldwell will be wearing, Lily
Samii has designed a v-neck silk jersey gown accented with crystal
pleated silk chiffon, leading the eye from her shoulders down to her
waist where the chiffon converges. More pleated chiffon wraps her waist
and intersects at the small of her back where a hand made stone
medallion sits at the top of a pleated chiffon waterfall which cascades
down to the floor. This is a silently dramatic and powerful gown that
you will not want to miss!
SF Luxe, a blog about rich people and what they wear, has a post informing you which "people will be wearing gowns by local designer Lily Samii to the
Symphony and Opera galas this week (September 3rd and 5th, 2008.)" Because knowing is half the battle. Sep 3, 2008 12:02 PM Posted by brittneygilbert 
I love this building; it's jutting mass warms my cold, cold heart. It's tied with the Hobart Building for my favorite in downtown SF. Which leads me to wonder, architecture lovers, what is your favorite building in SOMA? The Financial District? What about all of SF? Sep 3, 2008 11:35 AM Posted by brittneygilbert We talked Bay Area real estate yesterday, and so are a bunch of other people over at the hopping blog SocketSite. You see, a London-based couple is moving to San Francisco, where they'd like to buy a house. Problem is, they only have half a million to spend on it:
A young couple living in London, but making the move to San Francisco next month, drops us a note looking for some guidance on San Francisco neighborhoods. Or rather more specifically, “[i]f you know London, please try to compare areas!” And as much as we love London (and know San Francisco), beyond the superficial we can't. Any plugged-in ex-Londoners up for the challenge? (We’ll summarize any comments later this week.) Oh, and then there’s the real reason they wrote, “we're looking to buy a place, for around $500k…[and] finding it pretty hard to find what we want…a nice 2 bed or large 1 bed in a safe part of town.” Of course “nice,” “safe,” "large," and “town” are all subjective (hence the first question). And we can only hope they meant £500,000 and not $500,000. But if not, let's just consider it another little challenge… Oh my how the comments are flying, most of which amount to: Move to Berkeley instead. But there are interesting comparisons of SF neighborhoods to London neighborhoods, like that Pacific Heights is reminiscent of Notting Hill. Worth a read if you are a real estate junkie. [via Redfin Sweet Digs] Sep 3, 2008 10:57 AM Posted by brittneygilbert Violent crime in Oakland continues to be the primary concern for the East Bay city's residents, and with good reason. Yet the ever-vigilant V Smoothe at A Better Oakland notes, cops in the O are instead ticketing rogue cigarette smokers and "cabaret clubs":
[T[he idea behind this is that you need to get a special license to have live music. I think this is annoying, but wev, I understanding the reasoning behind it. And I wouldn’t have any problem with it at all if the City didn’t make it so damn difficult to get the stupid license in the first place. So, it’s the City’s position that you need a cabaret license not just for live music, but also for DJs. I understand the reasoning behind this as well. If you want to open a big dance club, you’re going to have all the same associated issues as you would if you were having bands play every night. So for dance clubs with DJs, it makes sense.
What does not make sense is that the City considers all bars with DJs to be cabarets, including those that do not have dance floors. It’s still considered live entertainment, even though what you’re talking about is basically some guy sitting in a corner pressing buttons on a laptop while people ignore him all night. I’m sorry, this just a stupid requirement that places a totally unnecessary burden and cost on local businesses. But beyond that, just…OMFG. This is what we have police officers doing on a Saturday night? How is this a good use of resources? The lady does have a point. She usually does. If you are at all interested in Oakland city crime, government and other municipal matters, then A Better Oakland is a must-read. Sep 3, 2008 10:33 AM Posted by brittneygilbert Get out your decoder rings, kids. The estimable Brock Keeling at SFist has posted a poster that announces something about Nader, protesting, MySpace, peace signs in neon and Obama's head. I have no idea, and no one else seems to either. See if you can figure out wtf is going on. Sep 3, 2008 10:20 AM Posted by brittneygilbert  This morning this couple was sitting on the floor of a crowded Millbrae-bound train, legs outstretched. She was putting on makeup, he was reading a book. People filed in around them since all the seats were long-ago filled, and took their posts at the poles. It got more and more crowded with each new stop on the way to the City, yet these two sat, legs uncrooked and comfortable, on the floor. People could have been less squished if these two had stood up, but they didn't, not til Embarcadero. Perhaps I should direct this to the lovely MUNI Manners ladies, but I'll open up the floor: Is this acceptable BART behavior? Leaving aside the fact that sitting on that gross BART carpet is an exercise in immune system management, is this considered rude? | |